For the first time, a national study on food safety has put a number to what had long gone uncounted from an economics perspective. Titled "", the study initiated by the 91̽»¨'s (SFA) National Centre of Food Science, in collaboration with the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health and the Communicable Diseases Agency in 91̽»¨, shows how much is at stake.
Foodborne diseases are silently nibbling away at 91̽»¨'s wallet — to the tune of at least $80.4 million every single year.
Yet, this only accounts for direct healthcare costs — medical consultations, treatment, and self-medication – and the indirect costs of productivity lost when workers fall ill or must care for family members who are unwell.

Ripple Effects Across the Economy
Food safety lapses can occur at any point along the food chain, from farm to fork. However, when they make headlines, the spotlight tends to fall on the most visible consequences: food recalls, regulatory fines, and business closures. But this is only part of the picture.
The effects of foodborne diseases have wide ranging consequences impacting Ìýbusinesses, workers, public health systems, and society. More than a third of the total estimated economic losses have been attributed to reduced productivity alone. For instance, productivity losses from workers falling sick or having to care for family members who are unwell.
But there are other economic losses beyond a reduction in output. Food businesses may experience a dip in consumer confidence in the wake of a single foodborne outbreak. In a sector where reputation is closely tied to revenue, the damage can be lasting.
ÌýOur healthcare services may also face increased load, and foodborne illness investigations as well as additional inspections demand more regulatory resources.
Taking Action: What Food Businesses Can Do
We can all take preventive measures to reduce the economic cost of food safety lapses through the collective actions of the food industry, consumers and Government. While SFA strives to foster an enabling environment through an integrated food safety system and consumers can make informed food safety decisions, there are also practical actions that food business operators can take.
The table below outlines the preventive measures that the industry can adopt to combat the three main pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Listeria monocytogenes) identified in the study.
| Pathogen | Common Causes | Preventive Measures |
| Salmonella |
|
|
| Campylobacter |
| |
| ListeriaÌýmonocytogenes |
|
|
Ìý
The Business Case for Prevention
The findings leave little room for complacency: food safety lapses impose real and avoidable costs on businesses, workers, and the wider economy. For food businesses, prevention is not merely regulatory compliance, but a critical business imperative to protect consumer trust, operational continuity, and long‑term viability. By investing in robust food safety practices and addressing key risk areas across operations, the industry can play a decisive role in reducing foodborne illnesses, safeguarding public health, and strengthening the resilience of 91̽»¨â€™s food system.